4.3.1 Extent to which CCAMLR has adopted integrated MCS measures (e.g. required use of VMS, observers, catch documentation and trade tracking schemes, restrictions on transhipment, boarding and inspection schemes)
4.3.2 Extent to which these measures are effectively implemented
| Recommendation | Responsible body | Activities to date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.3.2.1 The CDS should be amended to provide for the linkage of daily catch data with DCDs and that should definitions be revised to ensure there is no ambiguity as to when and where catch can be landed or transhipped (i.e. a clear definition of both ‘in port’ and ‘at sea’). This may well require an explicit prohibition of all transhipments except under the control of an appropriate port or flag authority. | SCIC/Secretariat | (2008)CCAMLR-XXVII, Annex 5, paragraph 7.5; (2008)CCAMLR-XXVII, Annex 5, paragraphs 7.4 and 7.5 and adoption of a standard port inspection report form as part of CM 10-03; (2009)CCAMLR-XXVIII, Annex 5, paragraph 7.2; Adoption of Mesure de conservation 10-09 (Transhipments); Adoption of Mesure de conservation 23-07 (Daily reporting); (2012)CCAMLR-XXXI, Annex 6, paragraph 8.14; (2013)CCAMLR-XXXII, Annex 6, paragraphs 20 to 22; (2013)CCAMLR-XXXII, Annex 6, Appendix I; (2014)CCAMLR-XXXIII, Annex 6, paragraphs 150 and 153 to 160; (2015)CCAMLR-XXXIV, paragraphs 3.66 to 3.69; (2015)CCAMLR-XXXIV, Annex 6, paragraphs 90 to 92 and 174 to 184; (2015)CCAMLR-XXXIV/27 ; (2016)CCAMLR-XXXV, paragraphs 3.18 to 3.20 and 3.32 to 3.59; (2016)CCAMLR-XXXV, Annex 6, paragraphs 130 to 136 and 162 to 166 (2016)CCAMLR-XXXV/24 and CCAMLR-XXXV/29 . |
Secretariat’s implementation of Data Systems Management Review Recommendation P2 (Enterprise Data Model started in 2011) starts to address this recommendation. Secretariat’s proposal for the development of an integrated Monitoring, Control and Surveillance information management system. Linkages to USA proposal to establish Member query and reports in the E-CDS (CCAMLR-XXX/27 ) |
| 4.3.2.2 C-VMS data for all fisheries be reported directly to the Secretariat in real time. | SCIC/ Commission | (2008)CCAMLR-XXVII, Annex 5, paragraph 7.5; (2009)CCAMLR-XXVIII, Annex 5, paragraph 2.96; (2009)CCAMLR-XXVIII, Annex 5, paragraph 7.2; (2009)CCAMLR-XXVIII/36 ; (2010)CCAMLR-XXIX, paragraph 12.9 (2015)See CCAMLR-XXXIV, paragraphs 3.37 to 3.51; (2015)CM 10-04 (2015). |
Prepare a matrix for direct VMS reporting to the Secretariat? Secretariat proposal to review the Commission’s VMS (CCAMLR-XXX/BG/10 ) |
| 4.3.2.3 There be unhindered access to real-time VMS data for surveillance and inspection activities (both in terms of their planning and implementation). | SCIC/ Commission | Mesure de conservation 10-04, paragraphs 8 to 23 (2004)CCAMLR-XXIII, paragraph 10.8; (2004)CCAMLR-XXIII, Annex 5 paragraph 3.40; (2004)CCAMLR-XXIII/49 and CCAMLR-XXIII/BG/12 . |
USA proposal to enhance planning for inspection and enforcement (CCAMLR-XXX/26 ) |
| 4.3.2.4 CCAMLR should review the approach to inspections adopted in RFMOs so as to develop a more effective and contemporary inspection regime. | SCIC/ Commission | Proposals to consider the system of inspection have been considered in previous years. (2009)CCAMLR-XXVIII, paragraphs 8.3 to 8.8; (2009)CCAMLR-XXVIII, Annex 5, paragraphs 2.3 to 2.9 and 2.86; (2009)CCAMLR-XXVIII/40 Rev. 1 and CCAMLR-XXVIII/42 ; (2016)CCAMLR-XXXV, Annex 6, paragraph 145; (2016)CCAMLR-XXXV/02 . |
Task the Secretariat with a review keeping in mind the objectives of the CAMLR Convention in particular as they relate to the System of Inspection. |
| 4.3.2.5 Greater use should be made of multilateral inspections employing CCAMLR-designated inspectors from two or more Members. This would not only enhance the cooperation foreseen by Article XXIV, but sharing inspection platforms would also reduce associated costs. | Commission/ Members |
Joint patrol programs have been established between Australia and France. (2016)CCAMLR-XXXV, Annex 6, paragraph 140; (2016)CCAMLR-XXXV/02 . |
France report on illegal fishing (CCAMLR-XXX/34 ) Australia/France bilateral cooperation (CCAMLR-XXX/BG/09 ) |
| 4.3.2.6 There should be consistency in management and enforcement measures (including in the operation of the C-VMS) for finfish and other fisheries (including krill). | SCIC/ Commission |
Proposal for enhanced VMS reporting for krill fisheries. (2014)CCAMLR-XXXIII, Annex 6, paragraphs 200 to 205; (2015)CCAMLR-XXXIV, paragraphs 3.37 to 3.51 and 8.8 to 8.10; (2015)CCAMLR-XXXIV, Annex 6, paragraphs 146 to 157; (2015)SC-CAMLR-XXXIV, Annex 7, paragraphs 3.30 to 3.32; (2016)CCAMLR-XXXV, Annex 6, paragraphs 171 to 174; (2016)CCAMLR-XXXV/26 . |
EU proposal to amend Mesure de conservation 10-09 regarding notification system for krill transhipment (CCAMLR-XXX/37 ) Secretariat proposal to review the Commission’s VMS (CCAMLR-XXX/BG/10 ) |
| 4.3.2.7 The effectiveness of CCAMLR would be increased if CPs were prepared, in certain instances, to apply CCAMLR provisions to, for example, their flag vessels operating north of CCAMLR waters in the high seas, or to areas subject to their jurisdiction. Alternatively, CCAMLR could consider tackling this issue through agreements (e.g. MOUs) to achieve similar outcomes. | Members/ SCIC/ Commission |
(2009)CCAMLR-XXVIII, Annex 5, paragraph 7.5 – paper submitted by France relating to an evaluation of the conformity of French law and practice with CCAMLR CMs (CCAMLR-XXVIII/34 ). MOUs between CCAMLR and other organisations: ACAP WCPFC Exchange information with SEAFO; See 6.4.1.2. |
Task the Secretariat to review and report on existing MoUs. Consider future cooperation with SPRFMO. Secretariat to write to CCSBT regarding their consideration of a MoU with CCAMLR. |