CCAMLR

Data from 1995-1997 US Antarctic Marine Living Resources (AMLR) Program surveys in the Elephant Island area are examined to determine the level of sampling effort required to adequately assess the (1) abundance and demographic structure of Antarctic krill and (2) relative abundance and interspecific relations of krill, salps and other macrozooplankton taxa in the Elephant Island area during summer months. Both parametric and nonparametric techniques are used. Between-survey and between-year comparisons are made to examine possible changes in sampling adequacy resulting from ecological changes operating on seasonal and interannual time scales. The results of these analyses indicate that minimal efforts such as 8 station transects are generally unreliable. Results from most analyses indicate that the data from at least 55 stations are required to adequately estimate krill, salp, and other zooplankton abundance, describe krill length-frequency and maturity stage composition, and assess the abundance relations of krill, salps, and other zooplankton taxa in the Elephant Island area.

Exploratory fisheries for Dissostichus spp. have been operating in these regions for a number of consecutive years with the tagging of toothfish a prerequisite for the legal fishery. This paper presents a detailed study of the catch and effort trends in Divisions 58.4.1 and 58.4.2 and examines 4 assessment methods based on comparative CPUE trends, local depletions, a constant recruitment model and mark recapture data.

Detailed review on the food and feeding of Antarctic fish

The results of analysis of stomachs of Antarctic toothfish D. mawsoni caught by the Spanish longline from the longliner “Yantar” in the Ross and Amundsen Seas during the period from 29 December, 2006 to 3 March, 2007 are presented. The comparative analysis of diet composition of Antarctic toothfish in different small-scale research units (SSRU) of subareas 88.1 and 88.2 is given. The graphs of size composition of food objects of Antarctic toothfish and the same by-caught objects are shown.

Japan proposes the revision of the Conservation Measure 41-04(2007): Limits on the explratory fishery for Dissostichus spp. in statistical subarea 48.6 in the 2008/09 season.

A proposal to undertake scientific research in CCAMLR Subarea 58.4.4 over the 2008-2009 seasons is introduced. The first survey has been undertaken by a commercial fishing vessel, Shinsei Maru No.3, in 07/08 season covering the whole SSRUs (Small Scale Research Units). In the course of this first year survey, important information, including information on distribution of toothfish, size composition of toothfish, and by-catch species, has been obtained. However, the information obtained by just the single year survey is not be sufficient in order to quantitatively assess the stock abundance and consider possibility of re-opening the area for new and/or exploratory fishery. Therefore, it is essential to continue the scientific research to accumulate scientific information on toothfish in this area. Furthermore, the presence of legal operators in this area could contribute to monitor and deter the activity of IUU vessels. In addition, tagging and sampling activities during the survey will particularly contribute to the future study on the distribution and population structure of Dissostichus spp.

This paper describes a new vessel modification to allow setting of longlines via a stern-setting tunnel, and the proposed experimentation to evaluate this method's effect on the sink rate of demersal integrated weight longline (IWL). The stern setting tunnel consists of an elongated steel tube, built in to the longliner during a dry-dock refit. The tube angles downwards from where the line exits the baiting machine, which is positioned in the aft section of the stern setting deck, to the exit point at the water line on the vessel's transom. The exit point of the tube is understood to be slightly off-centre towards the downward-swing side of the propeller. The sink rate of IWL longlines, conforming to the CCAMLR standard specified in conservation measure 24-02, is planned to be tested in a series of sets using time-depth recorders during current sea-trials and approximately three weeks of fishing in the New Zealand ling fishery. To evaluate the effects of the stern-tunnel method, the sink rates will be compared to similar vessels using IWL and the same setting machinery but setting conventionally over the stern. The sink rate tests are not expected to be completed until just before the WG-IMAF meeting and it is intended that the results will be tabled separately at the meeting commencement.

This paper provides a summary of longline and trawl fishing effort, seabird bycatch, and seabird bycatch mitigation measures in Australian fisheries outside the Convention Area. Mandatory seabird bycatch mitigation measures are in place in all longline fisheries within Australia's national jurisdiction. Seabird bycatch is generally low and typically below 0.05 birds per 1000 hooks. Seabird bycatch is thought to be low in Australian trawl fisheries but, as yet, there are insufficient observer data to fully assess each trawl fishery. As part of efforts to better assess seabird bycatch in Australian trawl fisheries, a pilot study has commenced to undertake an initial appraisal of seabird bycatch in the largest Australian trawl fishery. Depending on the findings; the need for further assessments and implementation of mitigation measures will be considered.

This paper proposes that, for fishers whose vessels comply with certain conditions, the requirement in Protocol C1 of Conservation Measure 24-02 to test the sink rate of integrated weight longlines (IWL) before entering the Convention Area is an impost on fishers that is no longer warranted. Testing could instead be conducted in the first week of fishing inside the Convention Area, potentially reducing compliance costs to fishers while appearing to pose little likelihood of increased seabird bycatch. The conditions to be satisfied include that the vessel used IWL gear in the immediate previous season that fully complied with the required sink rate and that there have been no changes since then to the IWL, other vessel gear and equipment, and operating procedures used for line setting. Other requirements of CM24-02, including for regular sink rate testing of IWL gear during fishing in the Convention Area and reporting of sink rate test results, would remain unchanged, as would the requirements applicable to fishers using other types of longlines.