CCAMLR

The Commission on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) has the primary responsibility for developing a representative system of marine protected areas (RSMPA) for the Southern Ocean. Under the CCAMLR marine protected area (MPA) work schedule, two important milestones for 2011 are the identification of candidate MPAs and the submission of MPA proposals to the CCAMLR Scientific Committee. However, the majority of the Southern Ocean has not undergone systematic conservation planning to identify potential areas for inclusion in a RSMPA. We address this gap in existing knowledge by identifying areas that would contribute to a comprehensive, adequate and representative system of marine protected areas. We focus our study where marine protected area planning is unlikely to be underway. We aim to identify a system of areas that will capture the set of specified conservation features within the study area including benthic ecoregions and environmental types, pelagic regions, rare features, vulnerable marine ecosystems and biological features. We then provide information that will enable CCAMLR’s MPA workshop and other CCAMLR forums to assess the importance of the areas identified to the development of a comprehensive, adequate and representative system of marine protected areas for the Southern Ocean.The Commission on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) has the primary responsibility for developing a representative system of marine protected areas (RSMPA) for the Southern Ocean. Under the CCAMLR marine protected area (MPA) work schedule, two important milestones for 2011 are the identification of candidate MPAs and the submission of MPA proposals to the CCAMLR Scientific Committee. However, the majority of the Southern Ocean has not undergone systematic conservation planning to identify potential areas for inclusion in a RSMPA. We address this gap in existing knowledge by identifying areas that would contribute to a comprehensive, adequate and representative system of marine protected areas. We focus our study where marine protected area planning is unlikely to be underway. We aim to identify a system of areas that will capture the set of specified conservation features within the study area including benthic ecoregions and environmental types, pelagic regions, rare features, vulnerable marine ecosystems and biological features. We then provide information that will enable CCAMLR’s MPA workshop and other CCAMLR forums to assess the importance of the areas identified to the development of a comprehensive, adequate and representative system of marine protected areas for the Southern Ocean.

The "CAML / SCAR-MarBIN Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean"

Claude De Broyer (Brussels), Philippe Koubbi (Villefranche), Bruno Danis (Brussels), Bruno David (Dijon), Susie Grant (Cambridge), Huw Griffiths (Cambridge), Julian Gutt (Bremerhaven), Christoph Held (Bremerhaven), Graham Hosie (Hobart), Falk Huetmann (Fairbanks), Alix Post (Canberra), Sophie Mormède (Wellington), Ben Raymond (Hobart), Yan Ropert-Coudert (Strasbourg), Victoria Wadley (Hobart).

Biogeographic information is of primary importance for monitoring biodiversity and detecting impacts of environmental changes, developing the bio/ecoregionalisation of the Southern Ocean, designing marine protected areas, conducting comparative biogeographic analyses or discovering marine biodiversity hotspots.

At the end of five years of extensive biodiversity exploration and assessment by the Census of Antarctic Marine Life (www.caml.aq), with 19 CAML-dedicated cruises in the whole Southern Ocean, and following the intense compilation efforts of biogeographic data by the SCAR-Marine Biodiversity Information Network (www.scarmarbin.be), a new initiative, the multi-authored “Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean”, will synthesize the CAML biogeographic results on the basis of an unprecedented amount, diversity and quality of biogeographic data.

The “Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean”, involving 60 contributors under the aegis of SCAR, will constitute a major scientific output of CAML and SCAR-MarBIN. It will take the form of a collection of maps and synthetic texts presenting the key biogeographic patterns and processes of the Antarctic marine biodiversity (benthos, plankton, nekton, birds and seals) south of 40°S. The hard copy version in large format will be extended by a dynamic online version on the SCAR-MarBIN portal.

Contacts: co-chief editors:
Dr Claude De Broyer (Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels, Belgium) claude [dot] debroyer [at] naturalsciences [dot] be
Prof. Philippe Koubbi (Observatoire Océanologique de Villefranche, Villefranche sur mer, France) koubbi [at] obs-vlfr [dot] fr
 

The Terra Nova Bay area is particularly valuable for science due to the presence of unique marine and terrestrial flora and fauna and the high diversity at both species and community level.
From an oceanographic perspective, the area is characterised by the occurrence of the Terra Nova Bay polynya, a crucial region for the formation of the High Salinity Shelf Water (HSSW), formed by the salination of the Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW), that penetrates onto the continental shelf of the Ross Sea.
Herein, high primary production and strong benthic-pelagic coupling support species- and biomass-rich communities, either on the sea bottom (e.g. scallops and sponges) and in the water column. In fact, Terra Nova Bay represents a nursery area for the pelagic silverfish, a key species in the coastal food web, and hosts large assemblages of the crystal krill. All this supports several  colonies of top-predators, such as Adélie and emperor penguins, as well as flying sea-birds and marine mammals.
The Terra Nova Bay area has been widely investigated in the last 25 years:  extensive geological, oceanographic, marine and terrestrial ecological and biological research has been carried out, contributing substantially to our understanding of  ecosystem functioning and community processes.
The existence of several biodiversity databases (both terrestrial and marine) and of an ongoing marine long term research monitoring program make this area of high ecological and scientific value.
All these peculiarities have been already acknowledged through the establishment of two ASPAs (N° 161 and 165) and the setting up of a marine LTER site.
The awareness that the processes that make this area particularly valuable occur at a spatial scale which is larger than the presently protected areas suggests that management and conservation measures should be applied at a larger scale, by embracing more sites or enlarging the existing ones.
 

The details on designation of marine protected areas in the CCAMLR region are considered. The general and specific issues, such as MPA definition in application to CCAMLR area, permissions and restrictions, temporal and spatial extent are discussed. It is noted that the South Orkneys MPA designation procedure could be useful for CCAMLR MPA network development. On the Ross Sea, which still experienced small impact from human activity, establishing MPA here is important for investigation of climate change influence on ecosystems. The MPA Questionnaire is proposed for consideration to make easier the understanding of the Southern Ocean MPA designation process and problems.

Multi-resolution conservation planning: Designing MPA networks linking inshore and offshore ecosystems

Inshore and offshore marine conservation plans are often developed independently. This approach ignores ecological connectivity among ecosystems, across scales, and is economically inefficient. Designing Marine Protected Areas (MPA) networks linking inshore, continental shelf and offshore ecosystems requires a multi-scalar understanding of marine ecosystems and human activities. To address this challenge we developed a multi-resolution marine conservation planning approach and tested the method in the KwaZulu-Natal Province of South Africa. Data on 400 marine items including habitats, species, processes and human activities were collected for the inshore, continental shelf and offshore regions. A spatially nested system of planning units, ranking in resolution from 0.2 km to 10 km, was designed to select priority areas for conservation. Using MARXAN conservation planning software, the site prioritisation process operated a selection from the coast to the offshore domain where more planning options are available. This approach reflects the multi-scalar nature of marine ecosystem patterns and processes. It also allows the smooth integration of a continuum of data ranking in resolution from a meter (i.e. field observation) to a kilometre (i.e. global satellite images such as MODIS data). Our method is simple and replicable, it contributes to better connectivity between inshore and offshore conservation systems, and towards more resilient and efficient MPA networks.

Application of marine conservation plans in South Africa to national policy, regional planning frameworks, and local implementation

Marine spatial conservation assessment and planning initiatives in South Africa have emerged at different scales. A national offshore assessment, providing a very broad framework for biodiversity conservation planning exists, but is limited in the availability of consistent fine-scale data for the whole planning region. This is particularly problematic in the inshore, specifically the shoreline, where relevant scales of biological pattern are at a much finer level than offshore, and where variability in threats to the marine environment tend occur at the scale of m’s rather than km’s, and stakeholders are strongly invested in knowledge about the patterns of the biodiversity that are clearly visible to them. In this context broad plans suffer credibility crises when they do not incorporate information at the same scale as the local knowledge. Consequently, our national offshore assessment addressed only those areas deeper than 30m, and finer-scale biodiversity assessments and plans were developed for inshore areas. In the KwaZulu-Natal Province of South Africa, we have piloted an approach to work from the shoreline out to the Exclusive Economic Zone, using a multi-scale analysis.  We compare our results with existing, differently-scaled plans, and explore the issues inherent in reconciling the differences in the areas identified as priorities for conservation action, the responses from non-governmental stakeholders in engaging in implementation of the plans, and the challenges in achieving co-ordination across different levels of government.
 

At present less than 1% of South Africa’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is protected within Marine Protected Areas. This project aimed to support the identification of a spatial management network in order to represent offshore biodiversity, protect vulnerable ecosystems, contribute to fisheries sustainability and reduce bycatch. This was achieved by collating data, engaging with relevant industries, scientists, government departments and conducting systematic planning using Marxan. The project identified nine priority areas for spatial management including no-take MPAs, benthic protection zones and fishery and bycatch management areas. In addition, the project has engaged with offshore stakeholders from the outset, has overcome significant challenges in engaging petroleum, diamond mining and fisheries sectors and has built some support for offshore MPAs. Considerable challenges remain in the implementation of spatial management but the project has garnered effective scientific support across multiple institutions and is building industry understanding and support through a flexible approach.

Two studies are tabled for the Subantarctic pelagic area of CCAMLR areas 58.5.1 and 58.6, which covers the Crozet Basin and the north of the Kerguelen Plateau: one based on marine pelagic species (plankton and fish), and the second on top predators.
In this report, we followed three types of methodology: (1) a taxonomic approach based on communities only, (2) a physiognomic approach used for the bioregionalisation of the Southern Ocean based on abiotic and chlorophyll-a characteristics of the habitat only, and (3) a mixed approach, we called “ecoregionalisation”, which includes taxonomic, ecological and physiognomic data.  The mixed approach is a relatively new method and is demonstrated on mesopelagic fish here. It will be also applied to pelagic fish and zooplankton as work progresses.
The Kerguelen Plateau influences the position of the major frontal zones and acts as a barrier to the Antarctic Circumpolar Current which passes along its northern escarpment and through troughs to the south. North of the Kerguelen shelf, the subantarctic zone does not really exist. Instead, there is a narrow latitudinal band, the Transition Frontal Zone (TFZ), caused by the juxtaposition of the Subtropical (STF) and the Subantarctic Front (SAF). The Polar Frontal Zone (PFZ), between the Antarctic Polar Front and the SAF, is closer to the TFZ in the Kerguelen shelf area than it is in the Crozet area. The Agulhas Return Current zone, north of the CCAMLR area, is composed of warm subtropical waters. Our studies indicate that the change in communities and regions is very sharp at the PFZ and the TFZ. The main biogeographical barriers in this area are the SAF and the Agulhas Front. Over the island shelves and seamounts, essential habitats for fish larvae were related to currents and retention zones.
In this report, we showed the existing information that we can use to achieve the pelagic ecoregionalisation of this area. There are numbers of difficulties as samples are from different historical surveys and mainly concentrated in the Kerguelen area.
Four variables were used for the epipelagic physical regionalisation: mean dynamic topography, sea surface height variability, depth, and near-surface chlorophyll-a. Eleven environmental types were apparent. The results show a general latitudinal banding structure broadly consistent with the frontal structure of the region, with the Agulhas Return Current clearly apparent. Shallow topography around the region’s island groups and bathymetric features (Conrad Rise, Walters Shoal) give rise to smaller-scale structure generally associated with higher productivity.
Some examples on ecoregionalisation based on mesopelagic fish are presented. The first one concerns the modelling of the myctophid community at the scale of the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean using Generalised Dissimilarity Modelling. 12 groups delineated ecoregions which were associated with frontal zones and the topography. A boosted regression tree model was used to predict potential habitat of target myctophids. The series of fronts and their associated eddies developed south of the Subtropical Front influences these species habitat. One of the target species was E. antarctica. The models indicated that the probability of presence was expected to be low in the north, consistent with the limit of the main distribution of the species. The quasi-absence of E. antarctica from island shelves is explained by its pelagic nature and diel behaviour. A modelling based on abundances showed that the preferential habitat towards the east differs in intensity from one year to the next.
Application of these methods on plankton and pelagic fish will be carried out in 2012. A report showing the application of these methods on the pelagic realm of the study area will be presented in 2012 at the EMM working group.
 

More than 30 expeditions have surveyed the Kerguelen Plateau over the last 80 years. However, few of them have collected benthic organisms. Between 1961 and 1970, numerous surveys were initiated by Arnaud, Délepine, Hureau and Rannou. Sampling was done mainly close to the coast, and in limited areas. However, they collected numerous specimens and led to a first estimate of the local biological diversity. The richest cruises for the quantity of benthos collected are MD03 and MD04 (1974 and 1975 respectively) on the research vessel “Marion Dufresne”. The purpose of these cruises was to obtain quantitative and qualitative data on benthos and demersal fishes. The majority of the specimens have already been studied, although a number of them are still to be sorted and studied.

In 1987 and 1988, the French-Soviet SKALP surveys allowed identifying fish species over the continental shelf including fish larvae. Coastal studies were carried out during the 1990’s on fish larvae, juveniles and adults (Koubbi et al., 2001). More recently, the POKER I survey (2006), for demersal fish, POKER II (2010) for benthos and demersal fish, collected a large number of specimens on the Kerguelen island shelf, with 409 operations at depths ranging from 100 to 1000 m. The aim of SKALP and POKER was to investigate the abundance, biomass and distribution of fish, including fish species on the Kerguelen Islands shelf, surrounding banks and upper deep-sea stratum. POKER II allowed to estimate the biodiversity and the distribution of benthos. Additional data over the shelf are provided by commercial fishing boats.

The ichthyofauna of the Kerguelen Plateau is now well-known with 23 species occurring from the coastal area to the slope of the shelf (and surrounding banks), 32 deep-sea species and 57 species from the pelagic layers (epi-, meso- and bathypelagic) (Duhamel et al., 2005). Fish larvae distribution showed that there is an island mass effect allowing retention of notothenioid larvae over the shelf (Koubbi et al., 1991 and 2009). Segregation of early life stages was found to follow the scheme of Harden-Jones for some of the demersal species (Koubbi et al., 2000).

Currently, 960 species have been recorded for benthos (Améziane et al., 2011) including 111 species of sponges, 58 species of bryozoans, 58 species of polychaetes, 51 species of pycnogonids, 219 species of crustaceans, 196 species of molluscs, 105 species of echinoderms, 93 species of ascidians and 11 species of cnidarians. All these data are available in the literature and geo-referenced.

The French MPA project in Kerguelen will study Essential Fish Habitat, VME and patterns of diversity over the shelf including its slope and the seamounts. Essential Fish Habitat will be determined with delimiting spawning grounds, areas of distribution of larvae and nursery grounds for the most dominant species. Potential assemblages’ distributions will be determined in relation with environmental factors. For benthos, a precise inventory of species will be the first outcome. In order to define VME in the Heard-Kerguelen area, the ascidans, sponges and stalked crinoids, all recognised key taxa, will be analyzed in detail. The benthic communities will be described and used in habitat description and modelling.
 

The large-scale trawl exploitation targeting virgin stocks of marbled notothenia (Notothenia rossii) off the Kerguelen Islands occurred after the discovery by the Soviet Union scouting fishing fleet of the fishing grounds in the early 1970’s. The fishery shifted to icefish (Champsocephalus gunnari) and grey notothen (Lepidonotothen squamifrons) when overexploitation on the shelf and surrounding banks resulted in the sharp decline in the catches of marbled notothenia. The creation of the French EEZ in 1978 closed the free fishery but did not stop the reduction of the biomass of exploited stocks. The SKALP first surveys (1987 and 1988), despite bias in the protocols, revealed the poor state of biomass in these shelf stocks. Only the icefish fishery maintained a series of strong cohorts with harvestable biomass, which eventually declined and lead to its closure in the 1990’s. However, the more recent biomass survey (POKER, 2006) showed no recovery in these stocks. Possible changes between species (predators-prey relationships, ecological niche) and in the marine environment may have contributed to the decline of stocks. Only one species, the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides), of which deep-sea stocks have been naturally protected at the beginning of 1990. It maintained a high amount of biomass despite a strong IUU fishing episode from 1997-2004. The management of the stock needs to consider the migration pat¬terns of the species over the Plateau and outside. The analysis of fish distribution during the historic fishing period (1970-2010) shows permanent aggregations by species in specific and different areas of the shelf. This knowledge contributes in conserving vulnerable stocks, while providing opportunity to consider marine protected areas.